Michael Naft is a millennial who has never worked in the private sector. His job experience consists of working for powerful Democrat politicians only. Is this the right person to decide the direction of Clark County?
Michael Naft is passionate about banning the American flag, but he doesn't want to appear that way, so he banned 'flagpoles' that are big enough to wave a large American flag, and he says his law is not intended to ban the American flag. When we asked him to 'exempt' the American flag (read about it here) he responded by putting out this bizarre video from the county telling you that you 'can wave the American flag' but then explaining all of the restrictions on waving the American flag and tells you that you have a right to 'protest safely' (not sure what that means!). (see it here)
When 32-year-old Naft was attacked by us in a political advertisement for wanting to ban the American flag, guess who paid for his response?
Clark County taxpayers in this video. Should an elected official be using county officials and county property to fund his campaign expenses? (it's also illegal)
Whether Naft is old enough to understand what he is, we know it: he's a big government liberal who wants to dictate policy from the top down.
Do you want a 32-year-old with no work experience outside of serving government dictating how government will run?